<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review Google Talk 1.0.0.91 Beta (Leaked Version)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.muchhalasworld.com/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.muchhalasworld.com/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/</link>
	<description>Thoughts... Out of the Box</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mohammed Muchhala</title>
		<link>http://www.muchhalasworld.com/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-3054</link>
		<dc:creator>Mohammed Muchhala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muchhalasworld.uni.cc/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-3054</guid>
		<description>Robinah, please read this for all the deatils on using Gmail's Chat Feature
http://mail.google.com/mail/help/chat.html

And if you want to learn more about using Google Talk (&lt;a href="http://googletalk.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;googletalk.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;), the GT blogs got some real nice videos, do check them out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robinah, please read this for all the deatils on using Gmail&#8217;s Chat Feature<br />
<a href="http://mail.google.com/mail/help/chat.html" rel="nofollow">http://mail.google.com/mail/help/chat.html</a></p>
<p>And if you want to learn more about using Google Talk (<a href="http://googletalk.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">googletalk.blogspot.com</a>), the GT blogs got some real nice videos, do check them out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robinah</title>
		<link>http://www.muchhalasworld.com/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-3053</link>
		<dc:creator>Robinah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muchhalasworld.uni.cc/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-3053</guid>
		<description>i need to know how to chat on gmail</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i need to know how to chat on gmail</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connected Internet: The latest tech news &#187; Beta version of Google Talk Beta Leaked - Confused?</title>
		<link>http://www.muchhalasworld.com/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>Connected Internet: The latest tech news &#187; Beta version of Google Talk Beta Leaked - Confused?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 02:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muchhalasworld.uni.cc/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-225</guid>
		<description>[...] For a full review click here.  Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For a full review click here.  Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connected Internet &#187; Beta version of Google Talk Beta Leaked - Confused?</title>
		<link>http://www.muchhalasworld.com/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>Connected Internet &#187; Beta version of Google Talk Beta Leaked - Confused?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 00:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muchhalasworld.uni.cc/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-188</guid>
		<description>[...] For a full review click here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For a full review click here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muchhala&#8217;s World &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Talk 1.0.0.92 RELEASED</title>
		<link>http://www.muchhalasworld.com/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Muchhala&#8217;s World &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Talk 1.0.0.92 RELEASED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 16:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muchhalasworld.uni.cc/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-85</guid>
		<description>[...] Muchhala&#8217;s World          &#160;&#171; Review Google Talk 1.0.0.91 Beta (Leaked Version) &#160; &#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Muchhala&#8217;s World          &nbsp;&laquo; Review Google Talk 1.0.0.91 Beta (Leaked Version) &nbsp; &nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richie&#8217;s Space &#187; Google Talk sports new interface with pictures</title>
		<link>http://www.muchhalasworld.com/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Richie&#8217;s Space &#187; Google Talk sports new interface with pictures</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 03:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muchhalasworld.uni.cc/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-83</guid>
		<description>[...] Note - this is a beta version of a beta product. Confused yet? Me too. Basically, this is a test build. Install at your own risk, yada yada yada. And here&#8217;s a review if you&#8217;re not sure you want to take the plunge just yet. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Note - this is a beta version of a beta product. Confused yet? Me too. Basically, this is a test build. Install at your own risk, yada yada yada. And here&#8217;s a review if you&#8217;re not sure you want to take the plunge just yet. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Life of a Jackal &#187; Google Talk beta - beta</title>
		<link>http://www.muchhalasworld.com/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Life of a Jackal &#187; Google Talk beta - beta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 11:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muchhalasworld.uni.cc/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-82</guid>
		<description>[...] Note - this is a beta version of a beta product. Confused yet? Me too. Basically, this is a test build. Install at your own risk, yada yada yada. And here&#8217;s a review if you&#8217;re not sure you want to take the plunge just yet. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Note - this is a beta version of a beta product. Confused yet? Me too. Basically, this is a test build. Install at your own risk, yada yada yada. And here&#8217;s a review if you&#8217;re not sure you want to take the plunge just yet. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anotherblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Nueva version de Google Talk</title>
		<link>http://www.muchhalasworld.com/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Anotherblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Nueva version de Google Talk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 19:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muchhalasworld.uni.cc/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-80</guid>
		<description>[...] Reseña un poco mas completa [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reseña un poco mas completa [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pallab De</title>
		<link>http://www.muchhalasworld.com/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Pallab De</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 07:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muchhalasworld.uni.cc/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-76</guid>
		<description>Excellent article mate :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article mate :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hogans hero</title>
		<link>http://www.muchhalasworld.com/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>hogans hero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 02:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muchhalasworld.uni.cc/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Did they leak the privacy policy by any chance? Just wondering if they store conversations in perpetuity like they do with Gmail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did they leak the privacy policy by any chance? Just wondering if they store conversations in perpetuity like they do with Gmail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sahil</title>
		<link>http://www.muchhalasworld.com/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Sahil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 02:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muchhalasworld.uni.cc/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-74</guid>
		<description>I would love to use google talk but..
1) i dont have a lot of contacts on it so no use for it.
2) the Smileys suck.
3) love to see stealth Setting.
4) Definately need Offliners. 
        thats abt it. But without the no.1 there is no use for the others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to use google talk but..<br />
1) i dont have a lot of contacts on it so no use for it.<br />
2) the Smileys suck.<br />
3) love to see stealth Setting.<br />
4) Definately need Offliners.<br />
        thats abt it. But without the no.1 there is no use for the others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos Soler &#187; Google Talk</title>
		<link>http://www.muchhalasworld.com/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos Soler &#187; Google Talk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 21:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muchhalasworld.uni.cc/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-73</guid>
		<description>[...] Review Google Talk 1.0.0.91 Beta (Leaked Version) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Review Google Talk 1.0.0.91 Beta (Leaked Version) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.muchhalasworld.com/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 18:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muchhalasworld.uni.cc/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Although Google chat is relativly low on features, it should not be downplayed how small and effiecent of a internet chat tool this is (especially for voice communication).  Where programs (with many more features...) can use upwards of 50 mbs of memory, Google talk uses less the 1 mb.  This is especially usefull when running this tool when using other programs.  If I want many of the "missing" features I have plenty of options, but if I want a small and resource efficient tool, I know of only one :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although Google chat is relativly low on features, it should not be downplayed how small and effiecent of a internet chat tool this is (especially for voice communication).  Where programs (with many more features&#8230;) can use upwards of 50 mbs of memory, Google talk uses less the 1 mb.  This is especially usefull when running this tool when using other programs.  If I want many of the &#8220;missing&#8221; features I have plenty of options, but if I want a small and resource efficient tool, I know of only one :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.muchhalasworld.com/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 11:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muchhalasworld.uni.cc/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-69</guid>
		<description>One thing I would strongly like to see google add, would be encryption.  It doesn't even have to be a high-level of encryption, just enough so if someone is on your network they are going to have a few extra steps to take in order to intercept your communications.  I for one use my google at school quite a bit and sure don't want people reading what is not intended for them, and trust me, on big networks this DOES happen more than you would think.  I personally know of people who's hobby it is to sit on the schools network and intercept pw's, emails, etc...  Even a measly 64-bit encryption would fend off nearly anyone who would intercept data giving a greatly needed increase to security at a very minimal amount of increased bandwidth load.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing I would strongly like to see google add, would be encryption.  It doesn&#8217;t even have to be a high-level of encryption, just enough so if someone is on your network they are going to have a few extra steps to take in order to intercept your communications.  I for one use my google at school quite a bit and sure don&#8217;t want people reading what is not intended for them, and trust me, on big networks this DOES happen more than you would think.  I personally know of people who&#8217;s hobby it is to sit on the schools network and intercept pw&#8217;s, emails, etc&#8230;  Even a measly 64-bit encryption would fend off nearly anyone who would intercept data giving a greatly needed increase to security at a very minimal amount of increased bandwidth load.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j4s0n</title>
		<link>http://www.muchhalasworld.com/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>j4s0n</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 11:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muchhalasworld.uni.cc/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-68</guid>
		<description>i'll use it when it's fully loaded with cool stuffs that existing ones havent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ll use it when it&#8217;s fully loaded with cool stuffs that existing ones havent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoogleTalk 1.0.0.91 Beta (Leaked version?) &#187; SoftSift</title>
		<link>http://www.muchhalasworld.com/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>GoogleTalk 1.0.0.91 Beta (Leaked version?) &#187; SoftSift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 09:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muchhalasworld.uni.cc/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>[...] Most of Google&#8217;s applications have been in the Beta version all these while, including but not limited to, Google Earth, Google Talk, &#8230;etc. Since Google has publicly announced that these softwares are Beta version, I wonder is there a need to be so discrete about further release of such softwares, which is so-called leaked version, which I picked up from this blog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Most of Google&#8217;s applications have been in the Beta version all these while, including but not limited to, Google Earth, Google Talk, &#8230;etc. Since Google has publicly announced that these softwares are Beta version, I wonder is there a need to be so discrete about further release of such softwares, which is so-called leaked version, which I picked up from this blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.muchhalasworld.com/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 08:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muchhalasworld.uni.cc/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-66</guid>
		<description>I quit using MSN and now im stuck to Google Talk.. 'cause it's so simple, fast, integrates with Gmail and easy to use. Now, it looks like Google is moving to a main stream messenger with avatars, graphics and all the other garbage ... :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I quit using MSN and now im stuck to Google Talk.. &#8217;cause it&#8217;s so simple, fast, integrates with Gmail and easy to use. Now, it looks like Google is moving to a main stream messenger with avatars, graphics and all the other garbage &#8230; :-(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyhwana</title>
		<link>http://www.muchhalasworld.com/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyhwana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 07:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muchhalasworld.uni.cc/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-64</guid>
		<description>Still waiting for seamless encryption and conferencing. :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still waiting for seamless encryption and conferencing. :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meme</title>
		<link>http://www.muchhalasworld.com/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>meme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 06:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muchhalasworld.uni.cc/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-63</guid>
		<description>No emoticons is a plus. Conversations are so much better when they aren't littered with a bunch of graphics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No emoticons is a plus. Conversations are so much better when they aren&#8217;t littered with a bunch of graphics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rushabh</title>
		<link>http://www.muchhalasworld.com/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>rushabh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 05:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muchhalasworld.uni.cc/2006/04/02/review-google-talk-10091-beta-leaked-version/#comment-62</guid>
		<description>they're using * and _ for bold and italics, i guess following the conventions used in wikis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they&#8217;re using * and _ for bold and italics, i guess following the conventions used in wikis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
